User talk:Palosirkka/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Standard World Time Zones.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MikePollan (talk) 14:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear fi.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cherkash (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Dancer in Sari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 18:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

LX (talk, contribs) 23:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Godlo PRL.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Le Jour ni l"Heure.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.249.239.104 15:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 23:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Yana and sunset.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, GammaThetaMu (talk) 13:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Marking blurry items

Hi Palosirkka. You have started marking a number of images of paintings with the "blurry" template. Not sure what you wish to gain from it, and not sure how productive this effort is. As you can see, the images are rather old, typically 2002 or thereabout. They are used as documentation of the painters' works and they are at the time the ONLY images we have. So it is a choice between uploading or not having the work in our collection. Believe me, I ignore a lot of images of inferior quality from the auction houses, but some are - just - passable. Of course they will be replaced if the painting turns up at a later auction. So there is really no point in having the blurry template, anybody can see that the image is not perfect. You may disagree, and that is your right. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello User:Rsteen! I thought about it and came to the same conclusion. The wording of the template is actually pretty funny. "can be replaced if something better comes along" I mean like you said, that's what anybody would do anyways. Please do understand that I meant no offence with the tagging. What you're doing is great, please don't change anything. I completely agree it's better to have a bad quality version of a painting than nothing. Maybe we should have a {{Not blurry}} instead, as in tagging the good ones... there's plenty of sub par images around. Thanks again for helping bring the great works of art available. And stay safe friend! --Palosirkka (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi again Palosirkka. I am glad we agree. Maybe the "blurry" template is more relevant for photos of buildings and things. Sometimes people would just upload their shots of a church or a town hall, no matter the quality, and in that case it would be a good idea to mark the photo, to encourage someone to come along and make a better photo. Enjoy your time on Commons and thanks for your kind words. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Remove border

Hello!

I changed your tagging from {{Remove border}} (which is for still images) to {{Crop video}} so you know. Also, please let the categories be furthest down on all pages and tag files with {{Remove border}}, or perhaps {{BadJPEG}} a bit further up. Preferably above the license header. Cheers - Jonteemil (talk) 20:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Man on bench - duane hanson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MB-one (talk) 12:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


Explaining Igbo Wiktionary screenshots and copyright

Hi you nominated screenshots of my project for deletion as copyright violation. What went wrong? I translated the slide myself into Igboto train new editors on how to add words into Igbo Wiktionary and the screenshots I made was to add it to the event page.

How do I prove the event was held if it the images are deleted as it was an online event?


Regards Tochiprecious (talk) 14:26, 14 September 2020 (WAT)

Hi Tochiprecious! The problem was the pictures were of some computer program that you have no right to screenshot, i.e. proprietary software. That's what copyright law says... I know it sucks, that's why I only use and recommend free software. You will have to come up with some other way, perhaps there is none. --Palosirkka (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Palosirkka! Thank you for the clarification. I will use the free software next time.

Tochiprecious (talk) 10:14, 15 September 2020 (WAT)

deletion of pictures at User talk:Shaishyy

Hi, I think you deleted some of the picture which I uploaded to Wikimedia. all these pictures are taken from journals which provide Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to works they publish such PLoS one, neuroimage etc. How can I to cancel the deletion. all the best, Shai. for example see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/journal-information https://www.elsevier.com/journals/neuroimage/1053-8119/open-access-journal etc. Shaishyy (talk) 16:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Shaishyy! I'm glad to be found to be found wrong and apparently the images can be included as you say. I merely flagged the images since I could not find the permissions, it's a good idea to include the permission links in the uploads so they won't end up deleted like here. There is a permission parameter in the information template. Some admin deleted the uploads and it takes an admin to undelete them as well. I'm not familiar with the undeletion process but seems like this Commons:Undeletion requests is the place to go to. Thank you for your contributions. --Palosirkka (talk) 10:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Inkscape to text.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sabrina Santos TheCat (talk) 04:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Inkscape to text.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sabrina Santos TheCat (talk) 05:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Dieppe images

Dieppe image copyright violations. The base images are available under free use, and have been modified from the original. Original owner has been left on purpose as it is their original image. These do not violate any copyright rules, I checked before I created them. Please show the WP which suggests they are in violation. Grant Enderwigginau (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

https://www.google.com/permissions/geoguidelines/ See link which explains their rules. Stop tagging images without checking the source first. Enderwigginau (talk) 19:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
@Enderwigginau: It's good you checked but the images are not free. Now that you have provided that link they are indeed not copyvios but however it says they cannot be used for commercial purposes and thus will not be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Also, since copyright is the worldwide default, the burden of proof that something is free is on you. If you don't clearly indicate that in your uploads, eg. using the permission parameter, expect they will be deleted... What is WP? --Palosirkka (talk) 08:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Pgdp 28462864846264.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   22:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Mr. Gay Finland in his car.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apalsola tc 15:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Sweden ratified the Convention on 28 April 2021 and it entered into force for them on 1 August 2021.Source Hairy Dude (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

@Hairy Dude: Feel free to edit the image. Palosirkka (talk) 12:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please, do not delete the category:Allyghur. Create a redirect to category:Aligarh, instead.

Please, do not delete the category:Allyghur. Can you create a redirect to category:Aligarh, instead. [1] I'm sorry that I did not fill that category. There was a least one file in the category, but it was re-categorized to Aligarh. I filled this (now formerly) empty category with files that have the "Allyghur" spelling in the caption text. It appears that this is the same location as "Aligarh." --Ooligan (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

@Ooligan: ✓ Done No need to be sorry! --Palosirkka (talk) 13:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Dynamics

Head of bicycle 2404:160:8162:C960:1701:4BAE:91A9:ACB3 22:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Rubik's cube v3.svg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!


fabian tortoise

It seems to me the tortoise was first used in this 1951 pamphlet ( https://digital.library.lse.ac.uk/objects/lse:tik383teg ), but i might be wrong. Please add the original source, as you did not create the tortoise. If it really was first used in 1951, it may still be in copyright, and so is ineligible for Wikimedia Commons. Thank you.

Is there a coderead some additional feature to plain scour?  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Belfast mural 77.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Man on bench - duane hanson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

19h00s (talk) 13:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)